2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
Feedback platforms as a direction of public administration digitalization
ru
Original Article
AbstractFull textReferencesFilesAuthorsAltmetrics
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (66, 8 Marta St., Ekaterinburg, 620144, Russian Federation)
Anastasiya V. Orfonidiy
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (66, 8 Marta St., Ekaterinburg, 620144, Russian Federation)
The modern development of digital technologies, according to a number of researchers, significantly transforms the usual mechanisms for citizen participation in public administration through the approach described in the literature as Web 2.0 and Governement 2.0. In this regard, the article is devoted to the study of the implementation of individual feedback mechanisms in the practice of municipal government, both within the framework of the federal project "Smart City" and outside it. The article considers foreign experience in implementing such technologies (Civocracy, Maptionnaire, CitizenLab, etc.). and the results of a number of cities in the Sverdlovsk region (Ekaterinburg, Verkhnyaya Pyshma, Novouralsk, etc.).
In the course of the study, such methods were used as the analysis of statistical data and analytical materials of the Ministry of Digital Development and Communications of the Sverdlovsk Region, local governments; content analysis of the content of feedback portals of the cities of the Sverdlovsk region; as well as an assessment of the satisfaction of portal applicants, collected automatically.
It is concluded that the introduction of feedback technologies can be considered as an important step for expanding civic participation. On the other hand, it is important to work out the procedural aspects of participation and their further “digitization” within a certain platform.
In the course of the study, such methods were used as the analysis of statistical data and analytical materials of the Ministry of Digital Development and Communications of the Sverdlovsk Region, local governments; content analysis of the content of feedback portals of the cities of the Sverdlovsk region; as well as an assessment of the satisfaction of portal applicants, collected automatically.
It is concluded that the introduction of feedback technologies can be considered as an important step for expanding civic participation. On the other hand, it is important to work out the procedural aspects of participation and their further “digitization” within a certain platform.
Keywords: civic participation platform, feedback platform, local government, digitalization, civic participation, smart city
ГРНТИ: 06.56.51
Article received: August 17, 2022
Article accepted: October 27, 2022
Kettl D.F. (2015). The transformation of governance: public administration for twenty-first century America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Dahl R.A. (1956). A preface to democratic theory.
Schumpeter J.A. (1976). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. London, Allen and Unwin.
Scott J.C. (1998). Seeing like a state: how certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven, Yale University Press.
Kiernan M.J. (1983). Ideology, Politics, and Planning: Reflections on the Theory and Practice of Urban Planning, Environment and Planning B, vol. 10 (1), pp. 71–87, March.
Putnam R. (1995). Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital. Journal of Democracy, no. 6 (1), pp. 65–78.
Crosby N., Kelly J.M., Schaefer P. (1986). Citizens Panels: A New Approach to Citizen Participation, Public Administration Review, no. 46 (2), pp. 170–178. DOI: 10.2307/976169.
O'Reilly T. (2011). Government as a Platform, Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, MIT Press, vol. 6 (1), pp. 13–40, January.
Cardullo P., Kitchin R. (2019). Being a ‘citizen’ in the smart city: up and down the scaffold of smart citizen participation in Dublin, Ireland, GeoJournal, no. 84, pp. 1–13. DOI: 10.1007/s10708-018-9845-8.
Zhu Yu-Qian, Alamsyah Nurwahyu. (2022). Citizen empowerment and satisfaction with smart city app: Findings from Jakarta, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 174, art. 121304. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121304.
Zeeland Ine, Breuer Jonas, Pierson Jo. (2021). Walkshops for Citizen Involvement: Walk the Talk with Smart City Citizens, 2021 IEEE International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2), pp. 1-4. DOI: 10.1109/ISC253183.2021.9562922.
Jang Seok-gil, Gim Tommy. (2021). Considerations for Encouraging Citizen Participation by Information-Disadvantaged Groups in Smart Cities, Sustainable Cities and Society, no. 76. DOI: 103437.10.1016/j.scs.2021.103437.
González Briones Alfonso, García-Magariño Iván, Gómez-Sanz Jorge, Fuentes-Fernández Rubén, Pavón Juan. (2021). A Collaborative Platform for the Detection of Non-inclusive Situations in Smart Cities. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-85713-4_20.
Berntzen L., Johannessen M. (2016). The Role of Citizen Participation in Municipal Smart City Projects: Lessons Learned from Norway. In: Gil-Garcia J., Pardo T., Nam T. (eds). Smarter as the New Urban Agenda. Public Administration and Information Technology, vol 11. Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-17620-8_16.
Perezolova A.S. (2015). City e-referendums: Experience of the Active Citizen project, Power, no. 2. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/gorodskie-elektronnye-referendumy-opyt-proekta-aktivnyy-grazhdanin (accessed 18.07.2022).
© Article. Elena I. Vasileva, Anastasiya V. Orfonidiy, 2022.