2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
Raising funds for startups financing through digital tokens: global practice
ru
Original Article|Economics
AbstractFull textReferencesFilesAuthorsAltmetrics
Introduction. In recent years, blockchain technology has been actively applied in various areas of the economy. New innovative companies are increasingly turning to initial digital coin offerings to raise the necessary funding.
The purpose of this study is to review the existing sources regarding the coin offering process in blockchain markets and to present an overview of the individual elements of these processes. Due to the novelty of the industry, the author aims to systematically define the exact coin offering process, identify the projects geography, evaluate the regulatory framework and other inherent characteristics and challenges associated with the topic. The findings will be useful to investors, regulators and specialists studying the cryptocurrency industry, as well as small and medium-sized enterprises seeking funding.
Materials and methods. Such universal methods of scientific cognition as analysis, synthesis and generalization were used in the work. The research also collected and analyzed statistical data, normative documents and legislative framework.
Results. As a result of the conducted research, different types of digital coins were identified, the relationship between the choice of jurisdiction and its legislative base for coins placement was deduced, and the token placement procedure was described. In addition, the study revealed the problem of information asymmetry in the relations between investors and entrepreneurs placing their tokens. The reasons why companies may prefer new types of financing with blockchain technology to traditional methods of raising capital were analyzed. The author's definition of the concept of tokens was given. The reasons for the lack of financing of enterprises at the federal and regional level were highlighted.
Conclusion. As the conclusions the study highlighted the reasons why companies choose digital coin financing methods. It also identified the main problems associated with the supply of tokens: insufficiently developed legislative framework in a number of jurisdictions, including in the form of insufficient investor protection and the use of untruthful signals by companies in the process of raising capital.
The purpose of this study is to review the existing sources regarding the coin offering process in blockchain markets and to present an overview of the individual elements of these processes. Due to the novelty of the industry, the author aims to systematically define the exact coin offering process, identify the projects geography, evaluate the regulatory framework and other inherent characteristics and challenges associated with the topic. The findings will be useful to investors, regulators and specialists studying the cryptocurrency industry, as well as small and medium-sized enterprises seeking funding.
Materials and methods. Such universal methods of scientific cognition as analysis, synthesis and generalization were used in the work. The research also collected and analyzed statistical data, normative documents and legislative framework.
Results. As a result of the conducted research, different types of digital coins were identified, the relationship between the choice of jurisdiction and its legislative base for coins placement was deduced, and the token placement procedure was described. In addition, the study revealed the problem of information asymmetry in the relations between investors and entrepreneurs placing their tokens. The reasons why companies may prefer new types of financing with blockchain technology to traditional methods of raising capital were analyzed. The author's definition of the concept of tokens was given. The reasons for the lack of financing of enterprises at the federal and regional level were highlighted.
Conclusion. As the conclusions the study highlighted the reasons why companies choose digital coin financing methods. It also identified the main problems associated with the supply of tokens: insufficiently developed legislative framework in a number of jurisdictions, including in the form of insufficient investor protection and the use of untruthful signals by companies in the process of raising capital.
Keywords: blockchain, initial coin offering, startup financing, tokens, information asymmetry, digital rouble
УДК: 336.74:004
ВАК: 05.02.04
ГРНТИ: 06.01.11
Article received: August 22, 2023
Article accepted: October 05, 2023
Lambert, T., Liebau, D., & Roosenboom, P. (2022). Security token offerings. Small Business Economics, 59(1), 299–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00539-9.
Momtaz, P. (2020). Initial Coin Offerings. PLOS ONE, 15(5), Article e0233018. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233018.
Adhami, S., Giudici, G., & Martinazzi, S. (2018). Why do businesses go crypto? An empirical analysis of initial coin offerings. Journal of Economics and Business, 100, 64–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2018.04.001.
Hornuf, L., Kück, T., & Schwienbacher, A. (2021). Initial coin offerings, information disclosure, and fraud. Small Business Economics, 58(4), 1741–1759. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00471-y.
Chaum, D. (1983). Blind Signatures for Untraceable Payments. In D. Chaum, R. L. Rivest, & A. T. Sherman (Eds.) Advances in Cryptology (pp. 199–203). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0602-4_18.
Haber, S., & Stornetta, W. S. (1991). How to Time-Stamp a Digital Document. In A. J. Menezes, & S. A. Vanstone (Eds.) Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 437–455). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-38424-3_32.
Potashova, I. Yu., & Gonta, S. N. (2023). Critical analysis of the introduction of the digital ruble of the Bank of Russia. Bulletin of the Academy of Knowledge, (2), 357–362. https://elibrary.ru/tklvfr.
Korablev, A. Yu., & Anisimov, I. V. (2018). ICO as a means of attracting investment for startups in Russia. Azimuth of Scientific Research: Economics and Administration, 7(1), 18–21. https://elibrary.ru/ywyjvb.
Momtaz, P. P. (2021). Security Tokens. SSRN Electronic Journal, Article 3865233. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3865233.
Block, J. H., Colombo, M. G., Cumming, D. J., & Vismara, S. (2017). New players in entrepreneurial finance and why they are there. Small Business Economics, 50(2), 239–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9826-6.
Masiak, C., Block, J. H., Moritz, A., Lang, F., & Kraemer-Eis, H. (2019). How do micro firms differ in their financing patterns from larger SMEs?. Venture Capital, 21(4), 301–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2019.1569333.
Berger, A. N., & Udell, G. F. (2006). A more complete conceptual framework for SME finance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 30(11), 2945–2966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2006.05.008.
Schückes, M., & Gutmann, T. (2020). Why do startups pursue initial coin offerings (ICOs)? The role of economic drivers and social identity on funding choice. Small Business Economics, 57(2), 1027–1052. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-020-00337-9.
Shulaeva, O. V. (2015). Financing small and medium-sized businesses in Russian regions: Main barriers and government support measures. Strategy for Sustainable Development of Russian Regions, (29), 102–108. https://elibrary.ru/vbiugx.
Zelinskaya, M. V., & Medvedeva, O. V. (2016). Subsidies as an instrument of state support of small and medium business. Polythematic Online Scientific Journal of Kuban State Agrarian University, (123), 1291–1305. https://doi.org/10.21515/1990-4665-123-088.
Momtaz, P. P., Rennertseder, K., & Schröder, H. (2019). Token Offerings: A Revolution in Corporate Finance?. SSRN Electronic Journal, Article 3346964. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3346964.
Huang, W., Meoli, M., & Vismara, S. (2019). The geography of initial coin offerings. Small Business Economics, 55(1), 77–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00135-y.
Elitzur, R., & Gavious, A. (2003). Contracting, signaling, and moral hazard: a model of entrepreneurs, ‘angels’, and venture capitalists. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(6), 709–725. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00027-2.
Fisch, C. (2019). Initial coin offerings (ICOs) to finance new ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 34(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.09.007.
Spence, M. (1973). Job Market Signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010.
Ante, L., & Fiedler, I. (2019). Cheap Signals in Security Token Offerings. SSRN Electronic Journal, Article 3356303. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3356303.
Ofir, M., & Sadeh, I. (2019). ICO vs IPO: Empirical Findings, Information Asymmetry and the Appropriate Regulatory Framework. SSRN Electronic Journal, Article 3338067. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3338067.
© Article. Alexander S. Gaida, 2023.
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.