2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
Methods for evaluating smart city projects
ru
Original Article
AbstractFull textReferencesFilesAuthorsAltmetrics
Evgeny V. Popov (Dr. Sci. (Economics), Full Professor)
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (66, 8 Marta St., Ekaterinburg, 620144, Russian Federation)
Konstantin A. Semyachkov (Cand. Sci. (Economics))
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (66, 8 Marta St., Ekaterinburg, 620144, Russian Federation)
Modern intelligent technologies provide opportunities for the development of Smart cities. The Government of the Russian Federation pays great attention to the creation of smart cities. The essence of smart cities is to transform life for the better with the help of urban informatics technology to improve service efficiency and stimulate economic growth. This article will consider which methods of economic analysis are used in global practice in the study of smart cities. We will also analyze the practice of using smart city assessment methods in the Russian Federation.
Subject. Processes of implementation of the program-target method of federal budget funds management in Russia.
The purpose of the study: systematization of methods for evaluating projects for the formation and development of smart cities. Substantiation of the need for wider application of project management tools, as well as changes in the budget management structure of the budget system.
Methodology. Universal methods of scientific cognition were used: analysis, synthesis, generalization, abstraction, as well as methods of induction and modeling.
Results. A variant of adaptation of the matrix of division of administrative tasks of management to the sector of public financial management is proposed. It is proved that in the conditions of the current structure of state financial management in the Russian Federation, the effective operation of the program-target method is significantly difficult. A variant of the temporary adaptive structure of state financial management for the period of implementation of priority national projects until the end of the current stage of budget reform has been developed.
Scope of application. The results are used to analyze the formation and development of smart cities in the Russian Federation. The use of various methods of smart cities analysis complements and expands the classical analysis tools and contributes to the timely correction of decisions made, improving the quality and efficiency of financial decisions.
Conclusions. Approaches to the adaptation of project management tools to their use in the public administration sector will improve the efficiency of planning and use of public financial resources and open up new areas for scientific research.
Subject. Processes of implementation of the program-target method of federal budget funds management in Russia.
The purpose of the study: systematization of methods for evaluating projects for the formation and development of smart cities. Substantiation of the need for wider application of project management tools, as well as changes in the budget management structure of the budget system.
Methodology. Universal methods of scientific cognition were used: analysis, synthesis, generalization, abstraction, as well as methods of induction and modeling.
Results. A variant of adaptation of the matrix of division of administrative tasks of management to the sector of public financial management is proposed. It is proved that in the conditions of the current structure of state financial management in the Russian Federation, the effective operation of the program-target method is significantly difficult. A variant of the temporary adaptive structure of state financial management for the period of implementation of priority national projects until the end of the current stage of budget reform has been developed.
Scope of application. The results are used to analyze the formation and development of smart cities in the Russian Federation. The use of various methods of smart cities analysis complements and expands the classical analysis tools and contributes to the timely correction of decisions made, improving the quality and efficiency of financial decisions.
Conclusions. Approaches to the adaptation of project management tools to their use in the public administration sector will improve the efficiency of planning and use of public financial resources and open up new areas for scientific research.
Keywords: “smart” cities, method, economy, urbanism, digital technologies
Funding
The research was supported by the RFBR in the framework of research project № 22-28-20077
ГРНТИ: 06.03.15
Article received: March 17, 2022
Article accepted: July 01, 2022
Popov E.V., Semyachkov K.A. (2020). Smart cities. Monograph. Moscow: Publishing House Yurait. 346 p.
Popov E.V., Semyachkov K.A., Zhunusova K.V. (2020). Systematization of the engineering infrastructure of smart cities, Regional Economics: Theory and Practice, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 765–779.
UN Foundation in the field of population. URL: https://www.un.org/ru/sections/issues-depth/population/.
Harrison C., Eckman B., Hamilton R., Hartswick P., Kalagnanam J., Paraszczak J., Williams P. (2010). Foundations for smarter cities, IBM. Journal of Research and Development, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 1–10. DOI: 10.1147/JRD.2010.2048257.
Nam T., Pardo T.A. (2011). Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. In: Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research. Pp. 282–291.
Charisma F. Choudhury, Lang Jan (2018). Joao de Abreu and Silva, Moshe Ben-Akiva. Modelling Preferences for Smart Modes and Services: A Case Study in Lisbon. September. Vol. 115, pp. 15–31. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2017.07.005.
Ignasi Capdevila, Mathias I. Zarlenga. Smart city or smart citizens? The Barcelona case. Pp. 266–282, August 2015. DOI: 10.1108/JSMA-03-201-0030.
Claire Thorne, Catherine Griffiths. Smart, Smarter, Smartest: Redefining Our Cities, Smart City, pp. 89–99. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-06160-3_4.
Alan-Miguel Valdez, Matthew Cook, Stephen Potter (2018). Roadmaps to utopia: tales of the smart city. DOI: 2443/10.1177/004209807747857.
Sadowski J., Maalsen S. (2020). Ways to Create Smart Cities: or the Practices of Diverse Urbanism. December. DOI: 10.1016/j.tele.2020.101449.
Vita Santa Barletta, Danilo Caivano, Giovanni Di Mauro, Antonella Nannavecchia (2020). Managing a Smart City integrated model through Smart program management. January. DOI: 10.3390/app10020714.
Popov E.V. (2020). Econotronics. Monograph. Tyumen: Publishing House of Tyumen State University. 384 p.
Hirvonen-Kantola, Sari, Ahokangas, Petri, Iivari, Marika, Heikkilya, Marya, Khentilya, Helga-Fox. (2015). Urban development practices as anticipatory action learning: case Arctic smart city living laboratory. Vol. 21, pp. 337–345. DOI: 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00185-9.
Michael Hyland, Zihan Hong, Helen Karla Ramalho de Farias Pinto, Ying Chen (2017). Hybrid cluster-regression approach to model bikeshare station usage. Vol. 115, pp. 71–89. December. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2017.11.009.
Hirvonen-Kantola, Sari, Ahokangas, Petri, Iivari, Marika, Heikkilya, Marya, Khentilya, Helga-Fox (2015). Urban development practices as anticipatory action learning: case Arctic smart city living laboratory. Vol. 21, pp. 337–345. DOI: 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00185-9.
Michael Hyland, Zihan Hong, Helen Karla Ramalho de Farias Pinto, Ying Chen (2017). Hybrid cluster-regression approach to model bikeshare station usage. Vol. 115, pp. 71–89. December. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2017.11.009.
María Teresa Nevado Gil, Luisa Cagica Carvalho, Inna Paiva. Determining factors in becoming a sustainable smart city: an empirical study in europe, Economics and Sociology, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 24–39. DOI: 10.14254/2071-789X.2020/13-1/2.
Haydn du Plessis, Annlize L. Marnewick (2017). A roadmap for smart city services to address challenges faced by small businesses in South Africa, South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences (SAJEMS), vol. 20, no. 1. DOI: 10.4102/sajems.v20i1.1631.
Genevieve Giuliano, Sangyun Kang, Xuan Yuan (2019). Agglomeration economy and developing urban form. Vol. 63, pp. 377–398.
Sean M. Leahy, Charlotte Holland, Francis Ward (2019). Digital Frontiers: A vision of the future impact of technology on the classroom, Futures 113, October. DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2019.04.009.
Jeyun Yang, Youngsang Kwon, Daehwan Kim (2020). Focus of Smart City Regional Development: South Korean National Strategic Smart City Program, IEEE Access PP, no. 99, p. 1, December. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3047139.
S. Caird (2017). City approaches to smart City assessment and reporting: Case studies in the United Kingdom, Urban Research & Practice, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 1–21. DOI: 10.1080/17535069.2017.1317828.
Alan-Miguel Valdez, Matthew Cook, Stephen Potter (2018). Roadmaps to utopia: tales of the smart city. DOI: 2443/10.1177/004209807747857.
Fernando Crecente Romero, María Teresa Del Val, María Sarabia, Francisco Carrillo (2021). Studying the entrepreneurial genetic code of smart cities, International Journal of Technology Management, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 29. DOI: 10.1504/IJTM.2021.10042334.
Jathan Sadowski, Sophia Maalsen (2020). Modes of Making Smart Cities: Or, Practices of Variegated Smart Urbanism, Telematics and Informatics, vol. 55, no. 7, p. 101449. June. DOI: 10.1016/j.tele.2020.101449.
Measuring efficiency in smart cities.
N. Komninos, C. Kakderi, A. Panori, P. Tsarchopoulos (2018). Smart urban planning from an evolutionary point of view. DOI: 10.1080/10630732.2018.1485368.
Marcos Lima (2020). Smart organizations: conclusions from the hybrid environment of a smart city. DOI: 10.1007/s11365-020-00690-х.
© Article. Evgeny V. Popov, Konstantin A. Semyachkov, Dmitriy N. Borisov, 2022.