<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="1.4" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Муниципалитет: экономика и управление</journal-title></journal-title-group><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2304-3385</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="eissn">2308-8850</journal-id></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="edn">UTVAEE</article-id><title-group><article-title xml:lang="ru">Трансакционная ценность экосистемных цифровых взаимодействий</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Ecosystem Digital Interactions Transactional Value</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Попов</surname><given-names>Евгений Васильевич</given-names></name><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Попов</surname><given-names>Евгений Васильевич</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Popov</surname><given-names>Evgeny V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><email>popov-ev@ranepa.ru</email><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0002-5513-5020</contrib-id></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Симонова</surname><given-names>Виктория Львовна</given-names></name><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Симонова</surname><given-names>Виктория Львовна</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Simonova</surname><given-names>Victoria L.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/><email>simonova-vl@ranepa.ru</email><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">00000-0003-2814- 464X</contrib-id></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Ли</surname><given-names>Елена Вячеславовна</given-names></name><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Ли</surname><given-names>Елена Вячеславовна</given-names></name><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>Elena V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><email>volemi535@gmail.com</email><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0009-0001-0604-1802</contrib-id></contrib><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Ural Institute of Management – Branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (Yekaterinburg, Russia)</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Уральский институт управления–филиал Российской академии народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте РФ (Екатеринбург, Россия)</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Уральский институт управления–филиал Российской академии народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте РФ (Екатеринбург, Россия)</institution></aff></aff-alternatives></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub" iso-8601-date="2025-01-01"><day>01</day><month>01</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>52</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>26</fpage><lpage>44</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2025-06-10"><day>10</day><month>06</month><year>2025</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2025-09-03"><day>03</day><month>09</month><year>2025</year></date></history><permissions><license><license-p xml:lang="ru">Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License</license-p></license><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.</copyright-statement></permissions><abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Введение. Быстрая цифровая трансформация требует пересмотра традиционных подходов к управлению бизнес-экосистемами. Данное исследование развивает концепцию трансакционной ценности в цифровых экосистемных взаимодействиях, направленную на систематизацию процессов создания, распределения и накопления ценности в бизнес-экосистемах. В работе анализируются традиционные подходы к управлению экосистемами, ориентированные преимущественно на минимизацию трансакционных издержек, при этом обосновывается переход к ценностно-ориентированной парадигме. Научная новизна заключается в разработке концепции трансакционной ценности для цифровых экосистемных взаимодействий, что развивает экономическую теорию оценки трансакций в контексте экосистем. Методология. Исследование использует методологию системного логического анализа, включающую: критический анализ классических теорий трансакционных издержек (Р. Коуз, О. Уильямсон); систематизацию современных подходов к оценке цифровых взаимодействий; сравнительный анализ различных типов бизнес-экосистем; разработку оригинальной трехкомпонентной модели трансакционной ценности. Эмпирическую основу составляют кейсы ведущих экосистем и данные из рецензируемых статей, индексированных в базах данных Science Direct, ResearchGate и E-Library. Результаты и выводы. В результате исследования установлено: 1) трансакционная ценность в экосистемных взаимодействиях представляет собой динамический, многоуровневый результат, включающий не только прямые финансовые выгоды, но и нематериальные активы (доверие, репутация, данные, синергетические эффекты и сетевые экстерналии), которые в совокупности обеспечивают устойчивость экосистемы; 2) классические теории трансакционных издержек требуют существенной адаптации к реалиям цифровой экономики, где стратегическая оптимизация структуры ценности и справедливое перераспределение ценности между участниками становятся приоритетными целями, а не просто минимизация издержек; 3) предложенная концептуальная рамка преодолевает ограничения традиционных моделей. Обсуждение. Исследование развивает теорию экономических экосистем через новую рамку трансакционной ценности, интегрирующую материальные выгоды, нематериальные активы и эмерджентные свойства. Предложенный подход превосходит традиционные модели, системно учитывая синергию цифровых взаимодействий. Исследование признает контекстуальные ограничения, касающиеся эволюции ценности на протяжении жизненного цикла экосистемы и влияния регуляторных факторов. Перспективные направления дальнейших исследований включают: разработку отраслевых метрик оценки; изучение динамики ценности под воздействием внешних шоков (технологических, геополитических); проведение типологических сравнений архитектур экосистем. Реализация требует междисциплинарного сотрудничества экономистов, аналитиков данных и отраслевых экспертов для операционализации рамки для стратегического принятия решений.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Introduction. The rapid digital transformation necessitates a revision of traditional approaches to business ecosystem management. This study develops a concept of transactional value in digital ecosystem interactions, aiming at systematizing value creation, distributing and accumulating processes within business ecosystems. The paper analyzes conventional ecosystem management approaches focused primarily on transaction cost minimization, while advocating for a transition to a value-oriented paradigm. The scientific contribution lies in developing the concept of transactional value for digital ecosystem interactions, which advances the economic theory of transaction valuation in ecosystem contexts. Methodology. The research employs systemic logical analysis methodology, incorporating: critical examination of classical transaction cost theories (R. Coase, O. Williamson); systemization of contemporary approaches to digital interaction valuation; comparative analysis of various business ecosystem types; development of an original three-component transactional value model. The empirical foundation comprises case studies of leading ecosystems and data from peer-reviewed articles indexed in Science Direct, ResearchGate, and E-Library databases. Results and conclusions. The study reveals the following: 1) transactional value in ecosystem interactions constitutes a dynamic, multi-level outcome encompassing not only direct financial benefits but also intangible assets (trust, reputation, data capital, synergy effects, and network externalities) that collectively ensure ecosystem sustainability; 2) classical transaction cost theories require substantial adaptation to digital economy realities, where strategic value structure optimization and equitable value redistribution among participants supersede mere cost minimization as primary objectives; 3) the proposed conceptual framework addresses limitations of traditional models. Discussion. The study develops further economic ecosystem theory through its novel transactional value framework, integrating tangible benefits, intangible assets, and emergent properties. The proposed approach transcends conventional models by systematically capturing digital interaction synergies. The research acknowledges contextual limitations regarding value evolution across ecosystem lifecycles and regulatory impacts. Promising avenues for further investigation include: developing industry-specific valuation metrics; examining value dynamics under external shocks (technological, geopolitical); conducting typological comparisons of ecosystem architectures. Implementation requires interdisciplinary collaboration among economists, data analysts, and domain experts to operationalize the framework for strategic decision-making.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Бизнес-экосистемы</kwd><kwd>трансакционная ценность</kwd><kwd>цифровые взаимодействия</kwd><kwd>платформы</kwd><kwd>цифровые экосистемы</kwd><kwd>трансакционные издержки</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Business ecosystems</kwd><kwd>transactional value</kwd><kwd>digital interactions</kwd><kwd>platform ecosystems</kwd><kwd>digital transformation</kwd><kwd>transaction cost theory</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><ref id="ref1"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">[1] Попов Е. В., Веретенникова А. Ю., Комарова О. В.,</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref2"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кох И. А., Семячков К. А., Селезнева Д. А., Симонова В. Л., Федореев С. А., Челак И. П., Черепанов В. В. Экономические экосистемы. Москва : НИЦ</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref3"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">ИНФРА-М, 2024. 356 с. DOI 10.12737/2162080. EDN</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref4"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">AZNGPD.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref5"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">[2] Nelson R. R., Winter S. G. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Chang. Cambridge, Mass. : The Belknap Press</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref6"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">of Harvard University Press, 1982. – 454 p. – ISBN</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref7"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">0-674-27228-5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref8"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">[3] Baldwin C. Y., Woodard C. J. The Architecture of Platforms: A Unified View // Harvard Business School Finance Working Paper No. 09-034. P. 32 с. 2008. DOI</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref9"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">10.4337/9781849803311.00008.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref10"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">[4] Jacobides M. G., Cennamo C., Gawer A. Towards a theory</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref11"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">of ecosystems // Strategic Management Journal. 2018.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref12"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Vol. 39, no. 8. P. 2255–2276. DOI 10.2139/ssrn.3218233.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref13"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">[5] Teece D. J. Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref14"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance // Strategic Management Journal. 2007. Т. 28.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref15"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Р. 1319–1350. DOI 10.1002/smj.640.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref16"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">[6] Кулапов М. Н., Переверзева Е. И., Кириллова О. Ю. Бизнес-экосистемы: определения, типологии,</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref17"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">практики развития // Вопросы инновационной экономики. 2022. Т. 12, № 3. С. 1597–1612. DOI 10.18334/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref18"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">vinec.12.3.115234. EDN RLKOFE.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref19"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">[7] Шишкин А. Н. Перспективы и тенденции развития экосистем в РФ // Экономика. 2023. Т. 11, № 6. С. 57–61.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref20"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">DOI 10.12737/2587-9111-2023-11-6-57-61. EDN KTRNYT.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref21"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">[8] Бушуева М. А., Масюк Н. Н., Брагина З. В., Богомолов А. А. Роль бизнес-экосистем в формировании экосистемы экономики региона // Вестник Алтайской</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref22"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">академии экономики и права. 2022. № 12-2. С. 203–</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref23"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">209. DOI 10.17513/vaael.2639. EDN PHSGUQ.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref24"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">[9] Ратушняк Е. С., Шаповалов В. В. Концепция экосистемы в экономике и управлении: систематический</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref25"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">обзор // Российский внешнеэкономический вестник.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref26"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">2025. № 3. С. 49–65. DOI 10.24412/2072-8042-2025-</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref27"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">3-49-65. EDN ULXGFE.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref28"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">[10] Coase Р. H. The Nature of the Firm // Economica. 1937.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref29"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Т. 4, № 16. С. 386–405. DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref30"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">tb00002.x.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref31"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">[11] Williamson O. E. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting // Kapitel I – Führung und Organisation. 1985. P. 61–75. DOI</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref32"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">10.1007/978-3-8349-9320-5_6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref33"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">[12] Gawer A., Phillips N. Institutional Work as Logics</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref34"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shift: The Case of Intel’s Transformation to Platform</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref35"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Leader // Organization Studies. 2013. 34 (8). DOI</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref36"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">10.1177/0170840613492071.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref37"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">[13] Adner R. Ecosystem as Structure: An Actionable Construct for Strategy // Journal of Management. 2016.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref38"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">43 (1), рр. 39–58. DOI 10.1177/0149206316678451.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref39"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">[14] Jacobides M. G., Cennamo C., Gawer A. Towards a theory</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref40"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">of ecosystems // Strategic Management Journal. 2018.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref41"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Vol. 39, no. 8. P. 2255–2276. DOI 10.2139/ssrn.3218233.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref42"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">[15] Zajac E. J., Olsen C. P. From Transaction Cost to Transaction Value Analysis // Strategic Management Journal.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref43"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">1993. 30 (1), pp. 131–145. DOI 10.1002/smj.4250140303.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref44"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">EDN EPXGXB.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref45"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">[16] North D. C. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance // Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref46"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">1990. DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511808678.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref47"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">[17] Masten S. E. Case studies in contracting and organization // Oxford University Press. 1996.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref48"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">[18] Furubotn E. G., Richter R. Institutions and economic theory: The contribution of the new institutional economics // University of Michigan Press. 2005. DOI</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref49"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">10.3998/mpub.6715.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref50"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">[19] Rochet J.-C., Tirole J. Platform Competition in</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref51"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Two-Sided Markets // Journal of the European Economic Association. 2003. 1 (4), pp. 990–1029. DOI</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref52"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">10.1162/154247603322493212.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref53"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">[20] Branchik B., Shaw E. Net Transaction Value: A Model of</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref54"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">High-Involvement Decision-Making in Buyer Choice Behavior // Journal of Historical Research in Marketing.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref55"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">2015.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref56"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">[21] Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior // Organizational</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref57"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1991. 50 (2).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref58"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">P. 179–211. DOI 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref59"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">[22] Gigerenzer G., Gaissmaier W. Heuristic decision making //</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref60"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Annual Review of Psychology. 2011. (62), pp. 451–482.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref61"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">DOI 10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145346.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref62"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">[23] Stary C. Transactional value analytics in organizational</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref63"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">development // Analytics and Knowledge Management.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref64"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">2019. 30 p. DOI 10.1201/9781315209555-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref65"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">[24] Фролов Д. П. Постинституциональная теория блокчейна // Журнал экономической теории. 2019. Т. 16,</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref66"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">№ 2. С. 262–278. DOI 10.31063/2073-6517/2019.16-</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref67"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">2.8. EDN MEMKDT.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref68"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">[25] Фролов Д. П. Постинституционализм: за пределами</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref69"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">институционального мейнстрима // Вопросы экономики. 2020. Т. 22, № 2. С. 185–202. DOI 10.32609/0042-</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref70"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">8736-2020-5-107-140. EDN PUQUNT.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref71"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">[26] Фролов Д. П. От трансакционных издержек – к трансакционной ценности: преодолевая фрикционную парадигму // Вопросы экономики. 2020. № 8. С. 51–81.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref72"><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">DOI 10.32609/0042-8736-2020-8-51-81. EDN ZXRBMY.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref73"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">[1] Popov, E. V., Veretennikova, A. Yu., Komarova, O. V., Kokh, I. A.,</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref74"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Semyachkov, K. A., Selezneva, D. A., Simonova, V. L., Fedoreev, S. A., Chelak, I. P., Cherepanov, V. V. (2024) Economic</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref75"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">ecosystems. Moscow, NIC INFRA-M, 356 p. https://doi.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref76"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">org/10.12737/2162080. https://elibrary.ru/azngpd.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref77"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">[2] 2. Nelson, R. R., &amp;amp; Winter, S. G. (1982). An Evolutionary</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref78"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Theory of Economic Change. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. https://inctpped.ie.ufrj.br/spiderweb/pdf_2/Dosi_1_An_evolutionary-theory-of_economic_change..pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref79"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">[3] Balwin, C. Y., Woodard, C. J. (2008) The Architecture of</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref80"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Platforms: A Unified View. Harvard Business School Finance Working Paper, no. 09-034. https://doi.org/10.43</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref81"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">37/9781849803311.00008.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref82"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">[4] Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., Gawer, A. (2018) Towards</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref83"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal,</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref84"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">39 (8). https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2904.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref85"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">[5] Teece, D. J. (2007) Explicating dynamic capabilities: the</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref86"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref87"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28 (13),</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref88"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">pp. 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref89"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">[6] Kulapov, M. N., Pereverzeva, E. I., Kirillova, O. Yu. (2022)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref90"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Business ecosystems: definitions, typologies, development practices. Russian journal of innovation economics, 12 (3), pp. 1597–1612. https://doi.org/10.18334/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref91"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">vinec.12.3.115234. https://elibrary.ru/rlkofe.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref92"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">[7] Shishkin, A. N. (2023) Prospects and Trends for Ecosystems Development in the RF. Scientific Research and</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref93"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Development. Economics, 11 (6), pp. 57–61. https://doi.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref94"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">org/10.12737/2587-9111-2023-11-6-57-61. https://elibrary.ru/ktrnyt.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref95"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">[8] Bushueva, M. A., Masyuk, N. N., Bragina, Z. V., Bogomolov,</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref96"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">A. A. (2022) The role of business ecosystems in forming</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref97"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">the ecosystem of the regional economy. Vestnik Altajskoj akademii ekonomiki i prava, (12-2), pp. 203–209.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref98"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">https://doi.org/10.17513/vaael.2639. https://elibrary.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref99"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">ru/phsguq.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref100"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">[9] Ratushnyak, E. S., Shapovalov, V. V. (2025) The ecosystem concept in economics and management: a systematic review. Russian Foreign Economic Journal, (3),</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref101"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">pp. 49–65. https://doi.org/10.24412/2072-8042-2025-</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref102"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">3-49-65. https://elibrary.ru/ulxgfe.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref103"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">[10] Coase, Р. H. (1937) The Nature of the Firm. Economica, 4, (16), pp. 386–405. https://doi.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref104"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref105"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">[11] Williamson, O. E. (1985) The Economic Institutions of</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref106"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Capitalism. Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. Kapitel I – Führung und Organisation, pp. 61–75. https://doi.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref107"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9320-5_6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref108"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">[12] Gawer, A., Phillips, N. (2013) Institutional Work as Logics Shift: The Case of Intel’s Transformation to Platform Leader. Organization Studies, 34 (8). https://doi.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref109"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">org/10.1177/0170840613492071.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref110"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">[13] Adner, R. (2016) Ecosystem as Structure: An Actionable</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref111"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Construct for Strategy. Journal of Management, 43 (1).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref112"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316678451.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref113"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">[14] Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., Gawer, A. (2018) Towards</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref114"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal,</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref115"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">39 (8). https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2904.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref116"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">[15] 15. Zajac, E. J., Olsen, C. P. (1993) From Transaction Cost</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref117"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">to Transaction Value Analysis. Strategic Management</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref118"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Journal, 30 (1), pp. 131–145. https://doi.org/10.1002/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref119"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">smj.4250140303. https://elibrary.ru/epxgxb.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref120"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">[16] North, D. C. (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref121"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref122"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref123"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">[17] Masten, S. E. (1996) Case studies in contracting and organization. Oxford University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref124"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">[18] Furubotn, E. G., Richter, R. (2005) Institutions and economic theory: The contribution of the new institutional</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref125"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">economics. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref126"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">org/10.3998/mpub.6715.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref127"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">[19] Rochet, J.-C., Tirole, J. (2003) Platform Competition</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref128"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">in Two-Sided Markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1 (4), pp. 990–1029. https://doi.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref129"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">org/10.1162/154247603322493212.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref130"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">[20] Branchik, B., Shaw, E. (2015) Net Transaction Value: A</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref131"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Model of High-Involvement Decision-Making in Buyer</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref132"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Choice Behavior. Journal of Historical Research in Marketing, 7 (3), pp. 372–392.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref133"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">[21] Ajzen, I. (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50 (2), pp. 179–211. https://doi.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref134"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref135"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">[22] Gigerenzer, G., Gaissmaier, W. (2011) Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, (62), pp. 451–482. https://doi.org/10.1146/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref136"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">annurev-psych-120709-145346.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref137"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">[23] Stary, C. (2019) Transactional value analytics in organizational development. Analytics and Knowledge Management, 30 p. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315209555-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref138"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">[24] Frolov, D. P. (2019) Post-institutional theory of blockchain. Journal of Economic Theory, 16 (2), pp. 262–278.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref139"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">https://doi.org/10.31063/2073-6517/2019.16-2.8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref140"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">https://elibrary.ru/memkdt.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref141"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">[25] Frolov, D. P. (2020) Methodological Foundations behind</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref142"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Modern Approaches to the Spatial Distribution of Economic Resources in Russia. AlterEconomics, 22 (2), pp.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref143"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">185–202. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2020-</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref144"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">5-107-140. https://elibrary.ru/puqunt.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref145"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">[26] Frolov, D. P. (2020) From transaction costs to transaction value: overcoming the frictional paradigm.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref146"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Voprosy Ekonomiki, (8), pp. 51–81. https://doi.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="ref147"><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">org/10.32609/0042-8736-2020-8-51-81. https://elibrary.ru/zxrbmy.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
